SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] [Fwd: GQP]

Subject: [SECC] [Fwd: GQP]
From: jpryor@arches.uga.edu (Jay Pryor)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:51:31 -0500
I think that's a very good idea and I imagine that more folks than me have 
faced the same problem when working state contests sponsored by AL, TN, and 
FL.  However, I'm unsure about the "200 miles" definition.  Why couldn't we 
simply say any state whose border touches GA?

This isn't by any chance the same Bob Good that once belonged to the 
Atlanta Teenage Radio Club is it?

- Jay/K4OGG

At 02:33 PM 3/30/2001, John Laney wrote:
>Food for thought from Bob, K4BG (ex K4VHC) in South Carolina re GQP.
>73, John.
>Return-Path: <k4bg@cetlink.net>
>Received: from ns2.cetlink.net ([209.198.2.20])
>           by mtiwgwc22.worldnet.att.net
>           (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP
>           id 
> <20010330175707.OWWT23561.mtiwgwc22.worldnet.att.net@ns2.cetlink.net>
>           for <K4BAI@worldnet.att.net>; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:57:07 +0000
>Received: from devjoy (c5800-rhlsc-189-76-33.dialup.cetlink.net 
>[216.189.76.33])
>           by ns2.cetlink.net (8.11.3/8.11.1) with SMTP id f2UHv4T03470
>           for <K4BAI@worldnet.att.net>; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:57:04 -0500 (EST)
>Message-ID: <005f01c0b942$8ff8c800$214cbdd8@devjoy>
>From: "Bob Good" <k4bg@cetlink.net>
>To: "John T. Laney, III" <K4BAI@worldnet.att.net>
>Subject: GQP
>Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:53:34 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>         charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
>
>Greetings John,  I was delighted to see the results of the last GQP and all
>the work being done for the 2001 event.  I have come upon an idea which may
>have been already discussed, but here goes.....
>As you know I am in a "border state" and for practical purposes have to rely
>on 40 and 80 meters.  I found myself pretty much alone score wise.  Do you
>think the offering of a certificate of high scoring border state (being
>defined as 200 miles parallel to the Georgia border) station would be
>benefical ?  Not another plaque.  I don't think high or low power matters.
>If it has merit, I am sure you and the sponsors will know how to refine it.
>Thanks so much and best wishes.    '73,  Bob  K4BG



--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>