SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] SS UBN Report

Subject: [SECC] SS UBN Report
From: gary@noblepub.com (Gary Breed)
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 10:11:40 -0400
Jay et al.

I had a 4.1% "other guy" error rate (25 out of 608 valid QSOs).

10 missed QSO #
8 missed Check
4 busted the call (K8AY, K0AY, N9AY, K9AO)
1 missed Section
1 missed Prec.
1 invalid entry (?)

Although I was operating QRP, I did not get a large number of requests
for repeats and only one guy busted the "Q" precendence.

When I operate QRP I generally send CQ slower than the usual 30+ wpm,
especially high in the band. I try to match the sender's speed when S&P.

73, Gary
K9AY






> The fact is, I had 28 stations (3.2%) that busted some part of the
exchange
> I sent.  That's out of 903 raw QSOs/887 valid QSOs.
>
> Is the 3.2% error rate in the ballpark of what others in SECC experienced?
> It just seemed to me that 28 stations making errors was a lot.
>
> - Jay/K4OGG
>




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>