> Paul O'Kane wrote:
>
> > Very sorry, but this is the one RSGB contest that SD
> > does not support - simply because the club names must
> > be recorded in full - for example "Loughton and Epping
> > Forest Amateur Radio Society".
> >
> > SD permits a maximum of 11 characters - perhaps the
> > RSGB might assign appropriate abbreviations for each
> > affiliated club, if only for contest logging purposes.
I'm amazed that a longer field length is not possible.
"Dave Sergeant" writes:
> Clearly for the club calls contest one should be encouraged to submit
> Cabrillo logs and the unlimited club names seem to be incompatible
> with generating a suitable Cabrillo format - has one actually been
> produced for it?
Yes, see RSGB HFCC website - includes examples for CCC in Cabrillo format.
I logged call/serial and outputted in cabrillo, then added the rest manually
with Wordstar and Notepad. Hope I got the final score right. Remains to be
seen whether RSGB can read it or not - otherwise they're in for a paper log.
> Agreed abbreviation codes could
> certainly be allocated to each Affiliated Society just for the
> purpose of this contest.
It would at least be easier if one could write "ARS" "RC" and "ARC" instead
of the full Monty - what a pain. Likewise the names of some clubs eg "Enfield,
Southgate and district Wireless, plasticine and electronics society" don't
help either. Wonder if my use of the "&" symbol will upset them.
73
Richard W L Limebear G3RWL
g3rwl@amsat.org
FOC # 1188
So many beautiful girls ..... (sob) so little time
_______________________________________________
SD-User mailing list
SD-User@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sd-user
|