RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] UPDATE Re: FSK Keying

To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] UPDATE Re: FSK Keying
From: Kok Chen <rtty@w7ay.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:01:32 -0800
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
> On Feb 26, 2018, at 10:45 AM, Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com> wrote:
> 
> Most users are unaware and don't change
> the default.  And, why should they change it?  By leaving it wide, they keep
> their neighbors away from their operating frequency!

Psst.... don't tell them that a narrower transmitted signal is easier for the 
other end to copy too, Ed.  I.e., you will be asked for fewer repeats.

Practically all (well perhaps not MMTTY) RTTY demodulators today use very 
narrow tone filters, of the order of 50 Hz FWHM.  The extra keying sidebands 
are just wasted power that is thrown away by the demodulator anyway.  If you 
transmit 1 kW, some of it is simply wasted because the receiver is not even 
looking at the keying sidebands (unless the other end is using RITTY, which 
uses FSK Matched Filters).

We are lucky today that many, if not the majority, of hams have a panadapter 
whose resolution is better than 30 Hz.  Virtually everyone can see the wide 
signals for themselves.  Back in the beginning of the century, it was almost 
impossible to convince anyone that FSK is unnecessarily broad.  The following 
was written in 2005 a month before I retired (!):

http://www.w7ay.net/site/Technical/RTTY%20Sidebands/sidebands.html

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>