RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] UPDATE Re: FSK Keying

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] UPDATE Re: FSK Keying
From: David G3YYD via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Reply-to: David G3YYD <g3yyd2@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:55:10 -0000
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Tim

AFSK will outperform serial port FSK at the receive end of the link. No doubt 
about it because Windows is not and never will be a real time operating system.

Windows internal timing causes the transitions between mark/space COM port line 
to jitter in time from the 22mS per bit timing required for optimum decode. As 
a result this increases the error rate of the decoder.

With AFSK the timing is set by the crystal clock that is driving the sound card 
DAC( Digital to Analogue Converter) and therefore has no timing jitter. 
The decoder error rate will be as low as it can be.

Further most radios FSK keying is unfiltered creating a very wide transmitted 
signal that will cause avoidable QRM to adjacent frequencies. 
Using AFSK the filtering of the signal (in MMTTY the default should not be used 
- TX filtering should be set to 512 taps) means that the TX will take up a lot 
less bandwidth.

Better still is to use 2Tone DOOK (a version of AFSK) that is very narrow at 
<350Hz at -80dB. Fldigi uses a similar scheme and while not quite as narrow as 
2Tone DOOK is very similar and narrower than MMTTY AFSK.

By the way do you think that RTTY is FSK? Many do because of what has been 
written in the past. But look at how the decoders work and then match the 
transmission to the decoder. All decoders treat the signal as two tone on 
different frequencies. They use a narrow filter on each tone frequency - in the 
case of 2Tone they are just 45.45Hz wide at -6dB. Then they combine/compare the 
amplitude of those tones to decide if it is a mark or space tone that was 
transmitted. Note this means each tone is treated as a on/off keyed signal. In 
other words RTTY is really ASK (Amplitude Shift
Keying) or if you like OOK (on-Off Keying) So it is not FSK. Or as per 2Tone 
Differential OOK (DOOK) as the tone are differentially keyed one going off as 
the other comes on.

The best transmission system to use is the one that matches the decoder. 
2Tone and FLdigi do this.

73 David G3YYD

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
groupsrichart@gmail.com
Sent: 26 February 2018 03:29
To: KenwoodTS-590@yahoogroups.com; rtty@contesting.com; TS-590@groups.io; 
TS-590S@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [RTTY] UPDATE Re: FSK Keying of TS-590SG

Just to give everyone who has commented a little update:

1. I located another serial card and installed it in my computer. It gives me a 
full -/+12VDC swing on the data lines.
2. The optoisolators in my interface are not pulling the PTT and FSK inputs of 
the rig low enough to work. When the optoisolator is turned on, I am still 
seeing +0.54VDC on the ACC2 inputs to the rig.
3. I tried different values of current limiting resistors from 100Ω to 1.5KΩ on 
the inputs to the optoisolators with no change.
4. I checked my junk box for some NPN transistors and found none (I could have 
sworn I had some 2N2222s), so I have a few on order for the coming week. I plan 
to build the simple resistor/transistor interface that many have suggested.
5. After I get FSK working, I do plan to also try AFSK. There seems to be a 
spirited debate among many as to which is best. I have no doubt that either 
method properly used can give good results so I want to find out operationally 
which method I prefer.

My thanks to everyone who has taken the time to respond with your comments and 
suggestions. I found them all very helpful.

73,
Tim WS4V

On 2/23/2018 2:49 PM, groupsrichart@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I would like to hear from anyone who is successfully keying the FSK 
> and PTT lines via the ACC2 connector on the rear panel of the 
> TS-590SG. What serial adapter and what hardware interface are you 
> using to do so?
>
> I have tried two different interfaces using optoisolators to attempt 
> FSK and PTT keying from a serial card to the rear panel ACC2 
> connector. Both attempts have failed. I am using MMTTY software for 
> keying and I do get the requisite signal change on TXD pin 3 (FSK) and 
> RTS pin 7 (PTT) lines. I have also verified proper setup of the '590 
> by manually grounding the inputs PKS pin 9 (PTT) and RTTY pin 2 (FSK) 
> on the ACC2 connector.
>
> However, I *think* the problem lies with the serial card not providing 
> enough voltage/current for the optoisolators to completely turn on and 
> provide a hard ground to the ACC2 inputs. I have tried two different 
> serial cards and one swings from -4.9 to +5.0 VDC on the data lines 
> and the other card swings from -3.8 to +3.9 VDC. The cards I am using 
> are a two port generic PCI Express SI-PEX15037 and a four port Perle 
> Fast 4 PCI card. Does anyone know of a serial card that has a full -12 
> to +12 VDC swing?
>
> One of the hardware interfaces has 4N25 optoisolators and the other 
> uses Fairchild FOD852 optoisolators. There are 1K series resistors in 
> the input line to the optoisolators and I have tried various values 
> (100, 220 & 470Ω) with limited success but nothing consistent.
>
> While my objective was to keep the rig isolated from the computer, I 
> am thinking about building an interface that uses NPN transistors for 
> keying. Is anyone using NPN transistors to key their '590? Are you 
> tying the ground from pin 5 of the RS-232 port to the pin 4, 8 or 12 
> ground of the ACC2?
>
> Any input is appreciated...I have been off RTTY since purchasing this 
> rig in November and I want to get back on the bands.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim WS4V
>

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>