RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint

To: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint
From: Al Hanzl <alhanzl@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 10:55:57 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I agree that the 5NN in CW helps me with receiving the exchange that follows. 
 
I realize that many contests do not require the signal report, but 
fundamentally, isn't an exchange of signal reports required for a valid Amateur 
Radio contact?
There must be something in the FCC rules or ARRL guidelines regarding this 
basic exchange. 
Al
K2AL 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 29, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> At one point when mode reporting on cards was not so reliable, the DXCC
> card checkers had some rules of thumb, like 59 indicated a phone contact
> and 599 indicated a CW contact.
> 
> I think we've moved way beyond that era, the few awards I knew of that that
> required QSL cards with honest RST's on them a few years ago, they no
> longer require RST's.
> 
> Some of the better modern RTTY decoders can use the otherwise meaningless
> but very common "599" sequence as a way of "locking" on to a RTTY signal in
> the noise.
> 
> I know for sure on CW that I've heard 5NN enough that it helps my brain
> synchronize and get ready for the real exchange that follows.
> 
> Tim N3QE
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>