RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone?

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone?
From: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 15:11:10 -0000
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Larry K8UT also wrote an equivalent for the Raspberry Pi see
http://www.k8ut.com/wpfb-file/rpifsk-v1-2-zip/

I have test K0SM Arduino TinyFSK and it works very well without any timing
jitter. 2Tone will drive either of these directly via a COM port. In this
case serial port is not being used for bit diddling so no jitter.

If you must use FSK then one of these or a external box with a hardware UART
driving the FSK line is OK. But as noted many rigs have very wide FSK
transmit bandwidths. The only one I know that has a reasonable FSK bandwidth
is US made Elecraft K3.

73 David G3YYD

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Alex
Sent: 27 October 2017 14:17
To: Peter Laws
Cc: RTTY contest group
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone?

Hi Peter,

Have you looked into TinyFSK?

http://www.frontiernet.net/~aflowers/tinyfsk/

I was looking into doing something similar as you with either a small form
factor PC, cheap laptop or some other device (which I still have to get).
Realizing that they would not have a serial port for FSK keying, I built an
interface that included the TinyFSK. It worked very well for me. I used it
with the N1MM logging software for some contesting as well.

73,
--Alex KR1ST


On 2017-10-25 22:31, Peter Laws wrote:

> Now my problem is that the NUC has no serial ports.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone?, David G3YYD <=