RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone?

To: rtty@contesting.com, "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone?
From: Rudy Bakalov via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:49:13 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I have two computers in the shack- a 2006 Core Duo running XP with 512 Mb RAM, 
passmark score of 1,100 and a high end workstation running Windows 10 running 
on 4 Xeon 2690 CPUs, 32 Gb RAM, SSD, with a passmark score of 25,000.

There is zero perceived difference while running N1MM+ with one MMTTY decoder, 
two 2Tone decoders, and one GRITTY for diversity decoding.

In addition to the logger, I run VE7CC client and microHam router.

The NUC will do just fine. I have a NUC clone as well and its passmark is 1500. 
You don’t need much CPU to run the logger and 4 decoders.

Rudy N2WQ

Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate 
autocorrect.


> On Sep 30, 2017, at 5:36 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@subich.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> ​So my question is this ... how much of the processing for RTTY is
>> done by the sound device (avoiding $0.99 USB dongles) and how much is
>> done by the CPU? Will their least expensive Core i3 be adequate?
> *ALL* of the processing (decoding) is performed by the CPU.  The sound
> card - whether it is a "$0.99 dongle" or a "$200 professional" card -
> is simply the analog to digital converter on receive and digital to
> analog converter on transmit.
> 
> When looking at Windows based computers for amateur use, you are
> primarily interested in the amount of RAM (16 GB is appropriate for
> Windows 10) and the number of "cores" (simultaneous execution units).
> With Intel processors, the sweet spot appears to be quad core processors
> (8 simultaneous execution units - each "core" handles two execution
> units) while AMD processors tend to do better with six core processors
> (each core can execute only one "thread").
> 
> 
> 73,
> 
>   ... Joe, W4TV
> 
> 
>> On 9/30/2017 4:40 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
>> I've been dancing around replacing the PC at N5UWY (2006 Dell Precision 670
>> with a Xeon or two - I forget - and 16 GB RAM) for quite some time now but
>> have now been introduced to Intel's little NUC boxes.  If you don't mind a
>> Celery processor, they're really cheap.  As soon as you make the jump to a
>> Core i3 (or i5 or i7), the price jumps up a lot but still +/-$300 if you
>> don't go nuts.
>> Some cases have room for a 2.5" disk, some don't.  No room inside for
>> "cards" but no one cares.  Some do have MB headers for serial ports if you
>> are desperate.  Plenty of USB 2 and 3 and DP/Thunderbolt and HDMI and SATA
>> connectors depending on which version you get.  These things also run on
>> "12-19 V dc", which opens up interesting possibilities.
>> ​So my question is this ... how much of the processing for RTTY is done by
>> the sound device (avoiding $0.99 USB dongles) and how much is done by the
>> CPU?  Will their least expensive Core i3 be adequate?  I'm assuming the
>> answer is yes but really need more expert advice.  What about for more
>> DSP-intensive stuff like the JT modes?
>> ​Here's an example: ​
>> https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=56-102-168
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>