JT65 and JT9 and excellent modes. I have over 144 entities worked on JT65 alone and
have worked all states on 10-80 meters (need only DE & RI on 160 and AK, HI &
ME on 6 meters.
Last night I worked two Japanese stations on 6 meter JT65 running 80 watts to a
4-element yagi (3 element SteppIR with passive element added) and this morning
JH0INP confirmed our QSO via LotW. There's lots of activity on 6 meter JT65 in
the summer.
I really like JT modes on 160 meters because I seem to be able to work new ones I
can't hear on CW. I highly recommend JT65 & JT9.
Don AA5AU
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Information please
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)
On Fri, 26 May 2017 09:20:25 +0100, you wrote:
You could think about using the other data modes. With low power and poor
propagation, PSK can work a lot better than RTTY.
The ultimate move across to the dark side is JT65. I started using JT65
about 10 days ago and have 60+ countries in the log, operating just a couple
of hours a day.
Very low power is all you need, but it's a horrible slow process with no
skill required. My only motivation is to get to 100 DXCC then back to RTTY!
John GW4SKA
REPLY:
Even better than JT65 is JT9. A fraction of the bandwidth and
according to the author, about 2 dB better with weak signals. The
protocol is the same. Give it a try, you'll like it.
73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty