RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Propagation

Subject: Re: [RTTY] Propagation
From: Mark Schoonover <mark@ka6wke.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 21:51:51 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Checking the bands outside of San Diego tonight there was S9 QRN on the low
bands & 20 was dead.

Mark Schoonover KA6WKE
Author: 4NEC2 The Definitive Guide
Website: http://www.ka6wke.net
Resume: http://cv.ka6wke.net

On Feb 9, 2017 7:20 PM, "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com> wrote:

> Yes, we get "propagation" and "activity" thoroughly confused most of the
> time.  ;>)
>
> Ed W0YK
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Shelby
> Summerville
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 10:10
> To: RTTY Reflector
> Subject: [RTTY] Propagation
>
> While I respect all the scientific propagation forecasts, I'm firmly
> convinced that the activity in a major contest, changes it from a "less
> than
> good" forecast, to "good". Nothing like a multitude of stations calling CQ,
> or tuning the band answering CQ's!
> Hope to see many "unique" prefixes.
>
>
> 73, Shelby - K4WW
> As I don't have an iPad nor iPhone, sent from my PC
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>