RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad?

To: Thom <ki8w@ki8w.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad?
From: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:16:56 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Thom,

As I have followed this thread from the beginning, it seems to me that one of 
your main concerns  in FSK vs AFSK is getting the frequency on your dial to be 
the same as the actual transmitted frequency. Am I right?

Stan, K4SBZ

> On Oct 25, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Thom <ki8w@ki8w.com> wrote:
> 
> Then I guess I am the mercy of Kenwood,  who built my TS-480sat. I am 
> thinking they did things right.
> 
> I have been using AFSK but I do not like the actual transmit offset ( based 
> on the displayed frequency) when using LSB.
> 
> I am about to spend a boatload of cash (my terms,  based on my limited 
> income) to put this radio into true FSK to eliminate that problem.
> 
> Like I stated before,  when I get this setup,  I would like someone from the 
> list to join me on the air and lets see exactly how wide my signal is.  Then 
> I will know.
> 
> 
> 73
> 
> Thom KI8W
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/25/2016 22:14, Kok Chen wrote:
>>> On Oct 25, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Jeff AC0C <keepwalking188@ac0c.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> You change the shaping by moving from FSK where you have zero control over 
>>> to AFSK where you have full control.
>> "you have full control" is perhaps a little overstated.  It should be "the 
>> software developer" has full control :-) :-).
>> 
>> 73
>> Chen, W7AY
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>