RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Contest this weekend

To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Contest this weekend
From: VE3FH <ve3fh@yahoo.ca>
Reply-to: VE3FH <ve3fh@yahoo.ca>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:11:34 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I don't agree with that, at least in SWO, 400W puts much stronger signals than 
100W. That's easy to notice by working British stations in the ARRL DX Contest.
And that's not the reason anyway, as I recall it the sponsor's justification is 
that they cannot enforce a power limit. I actually find the explanation rather 
peculiar considering the contest has single-op and multi-op categories but hey 
I drive on the right side of the road...
73,
Julio VE3FH/K6


 
      From: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
 To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com> 
 Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 12:56 PM
 Subject: Re: [RTTY] Contest this weekend
   
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:57:29 -0700, Julio wrote:

>The categories are far from being "many" because the organizers stubbornly 
>refuse to include low power ones. 
>
>73,
>Julio VE3FH

REPLY:

Perhaps that's because the power limit in the UK is just 400 watts,
and they figure that's close enough to 100 watts that no separate
category is needed. It is just one S-unit.

In any event, I count 10 classes plus SWL. Isn't that "many"?

Hope to see you there. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


   
 
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>