This thread gets boring.
73 de Goetz DJ3IW
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] Im Auftrag von Ron W7FIA
> Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Februar 2016 08:37
> An: ed@w0yk.com
> Cc: rtty@contesting.com
> Betreff: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating
>
>
> > From: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
> > Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:57:15 -0800
> >
> > The CQ is truncated (usually with the ESC key) and then the response is
> sent
> > on the other radio. And, a proper lockout (Last One Wins) provides a
> > failsafe.
>
> When I first read this I was puzzled, Last One?
>
> So apparently the thinking is that the operator is aware that one
> radio is xmitting and some reason has appeared that requires another
> radio to xmit, therefore you stop (via lockout) the prior xmit to
> begin a new one.
>
>
> > Ed W0YK
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> >
> > On 2/18/2016 8:49 AM, Ken K6MR wrote:
> > > I'm still a newbie at SO2R, but this begs a question: Why would you
> ever
> > wait for a cq to finish before responding to an actual Q on the other
> radio?
> > I'm constantly cutting the CQs short to respond on the other radio,
> whether
> > it's S&P or a dueling CQ condition.
>
>
> it's a long way to the top
> r
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|