Thank you Hisami-san. I would be very interested in hearing their
responses. 73 jeff wk6i
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:20 PM, 7L4IOU <ncb02761@nifty.com> wrote:
> Hello Jeff,
>
> JA RTTY band plan on 80m is as you understand,
> and I agree that your approach is the rational.
> I will QSP your mail to our (JARTS) mailing list.
>
> 73, Hisami 7L4IOU
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Subject: [RTTY] JA RTTY on 80 during the CQWW
>
>
> Effective this year JA RTTY ops may operate between 3520 and 3575 KHz.
> It
> used to be 3520-3530KHz. (They can also operate a range above 3599 but
> squeezing into that 1KHz sliver for US ops seems like a bad
> approach...?)
>
> This year I tried running at 3574 with just a handful of contacts,
> though
> at least I got JA in the log on 80 for the mults. The idea being I would
> still be close enough to the 3580 range to get other S&P.
>
> Later, I am wondering if that was a bad choice since JA antennas might
> still be tuned for the lower end.
>
> I'm just wondering if anyone tried a different approach with any degree
> of
> success.
>
> 73 jeff wk6i
>
> --
> Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
> Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
> Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
>
--
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|