RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] SO2R

To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] SO2R
From: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 19:43:59 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
True enough. The problem I see is if the station decides you have the call 
wrong at the TU message it’s too late. Once you send TU the other stations are 
now calling and you may not hear/see the previous station’s call correction. Or 
do you think it’s a completely new station? Or, what if your sending of the 
call <once> in the TU message gets clobbered, and now he <thinks> you have the 
call wrong when you really have it right.  Kind of like those stations that 
repeat your exchange to you. Did he get it wrong or did I get a bad decode of 
his re-sent data?

I know, I’m over thinking this. And I’ll be the first to admit limited 
experience. I’ve pretty much decided to treat RTTY and cw the same way. Except 
for a few CRs, all my messages are the same between modes. I just have the 
luxury of a machine to do the copying for me…

Thanks for your thoughts.

Ken K6MR




From: Bill Turner
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 19:30
To: RTTY Reflector
Subject: Re: [RTTY] SO2R


------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:44:23 -0700, K6MR wrote:

>I only wonder why we don’t do that on cw. Same problem, but I rarely hear 
>anyone do it on cw. 

REPLY:

Because on CW you can pretty much trust your ears to decode properly
or to be fairly sure that they did not. Not so with RTTY. The machine
can make a mistake without you ever knowing it. Redundancy is your
friend is your friend.  :-)

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>