Tim wrote:
"The frequency resolution and accuracy seems to have improved in the skimmers
in the past few years and often times I would click on a spot and be tuned
within 10Hz, that is great!"
Yes, indeed. I found the frequency accuracy of skimmer spots to be excellent. I
had ALL the RTTY skimmer spots coming in this weekend and it was amazing to see
the spots flying in at a pace that seemed like well over a hundred spots a
minute.
Unfortunately, IMHO, the RTTY skimmer still needs a lot of work. I would prefer
to see less skimmer spots so that there are less S&P stations are being spotted
and less busted calls spotted. It seems I got spotted quite a bit when I was
S&P. This means that other S&P stations are being spotted as well. This means
that a MAJORITY of the spots are not valid run stations. This is not good. I
understand there will always be some busted calls but hopefully work is being
continued to make this better. There was one particular skimmer that seemed to
bust the start of calls and this caused a LOT of spots to show up as new
multipliers. For the most part, I knew the calls were busted but it seemed I
was continuously clearing bogus calls from my new multiplier list. I nearly
blacklisted this one skimmer, and that's a solution, but I was afraid I'd miss
a new multiplier! HI
I am grateful for the time, effort and resources from the entire crew of
skimmer ops. They are doing great work and need to be commended. This was the
first time I've used the RTTY skimmer spots for a full contest and it was very
useful. It will take some thinking to determine the best options for using this
new tool.
When using non-skimmer spots, you can nearly rest assured that a station
spotted is a run station and you can chase them. The only real problem with
that is knowing whether or not the spotter was using FSK or AFSK and if the
spotted station is on the frequency of my radio when I go there. With the
skimmers, that problem appears to be eliminated (when using fFSK) and it's a
great thing.
But now you can't just click on spots because most spots are NOT run stations.
My solution, for now, is to run two separate packet windows (not sure this is
possible with WriteLog on a single PC but I did it on networked PCs this
weekend since I was single band). One packet window will receive skimmer spots
and the other non-skimmer spots. Use the skimmer spots to populate new
multipliers to a Packet Spots window and use the non-skimmer spots to populate
the bandmap. It may take some work from software authors or there may be
solution already out there I don't know about?
73, Don AA5AU
From: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
To: rtty@contesting.com
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 9:25 AM
Subject: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands
Wow, there was a lot of activity for CQ WW RTTY! 20M and 15M were filled
completely between 080-150kc above band edge,
The "bottom ends" of the band were particularly crowded.
I used 3 decoders simultaneously - MMTTY, 2Tone, and Gritty. I don't always
run Gritty for the more minor contests, but I did fire it up for CQ WW RTTY.
MMTTY is still my "main decoder". It decodes just a little faster than the
other decoders and handles the broadest range of senders.
2Tone did spectacularly well in decoding in the presence of strong adjacent
signals. This was particularly important on 40M and 80M where all the DX
usually had a strong adjacent local CQ'ing. It did not do so well with some
of the "slow RTTY" signals. 2Tone AFC always did "what I wanted" and helped
with a couple of off-frequency replies.
90% of the time I was looking between MMTTY and 2Tone.
Gritty did very well decoding in the presence of flutter and other unusual
effects, pulling out callsigns from flutter on 10M and the odd stuff that
happens on 40M at sundown.
Very shortly after the start of the contest I set my receiver bandwidth to
about 1200Hz because 2Tone and Gritty work best like this. If I set my
bandwidth too narrow it seems that Gritty just stops working. I also turned
IF gain way down so AGC wouldn't pump. Only a few times did I narrow up my
receiver bandwidth.
While I was not looking at the Gritty decoder all the time - I was always
looking at the Gritty waterfall. The Gritty waterfall is very very useful.
The color-intensity range and scroll rates work very well.
I happened to enter assisted as well. I started with VE7CC cluster and its
default skimmer filtering but it was not letting all the skimmer spots I
wanted through. Even though the calls were being spotted by 3 or 4
skimmers, lots of time they were not getting through whatever additional
checks were enabled in VE7CC cluster. So I went straight to
reversebeacon.net and took the full brunt of the firehose. It was obvious
not all the skimmers covered all the RTTY band - some (especially EU)
seemed to only be skimming in the 080-100 segments. But others were
skimming all the way up to 150kc above the band edge and those proved very
useful because activity was just huge this weekend! The frequency
resolution and accuracy seems to have improved in the skimmers in the past
few years and often times I would click on a spot and be tuned within 10Hz,
that is great!
Again, thanks to the authors of all these wonderful decoders, and the
skimmer guys.
Tim N3QE
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|