Be sure to read the article Seven Seas Shack in Feb. QST. for more on the use
of WinLink.
in a way I thought, would garner support. (As he was using it for aRRL
bulletins and
propagation reports).
Mark. N2QT
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 12:39 AM, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Ed, Joe has answered most of your points pretty well but he missed a few
>
>> On 3/1/2015 10:16 PM, Ed Karl wrote:
>>
>> Lastly, divulge un- encrypting methods for select OO's to police the traffic
>> so rendered.
>> There recently was congratulatory emails regarding possible rescue at sea
>> thanks to
>> Winlink . No definite answer as to "was the station a ham?"
> Ed if you're referring to the Bounty incident for the rescue at sea that's
> mostly a lot of PR.
> The Coast Guard does not have an email address for sinking vessels and I'm
> quite sure
> if the boat was going down the last thing I would grab is the HF, modem,
> battery and laptop.
>
> The OO's can't police the traffic now, I turned a case over to them and part
> of the reply was
> "we don't normally monitor those frequencies/modes". Why is the traffic
> hidden/encrypted to
> begin with? Makes it hard to self police like we're supposed to.
>
> 73,
> Ron
> K0IDT
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|