RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] NAQP Question

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] NAQP Question
From: Chris Plumblee <chris.plumblee@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:39:31 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I believe the rules were amended in the 1990s for all modes of the NAQP to
ban external amplifiers. Some guys were making arguments like "my old TS440
will only do 50w, so I use it at 10w to drive my Alpha to 100w." Others
said they were concerned with the longevity of their equipment if they had
to run their exciters at 100w; couldn't they just drive an amp instead?

One message I recall said something like "what do the organizers care
whether my 100w comes from a transistor or an 8877?"

As I recall, the folks who were running the NAQPs at that time, and who had
a hand in getting them started, stated unequivocally that the intention of
the 100w power limit had been to have ops use only barefoot transceivers.

I'm sure the details are in the cq-contest archives somewhere.

73, Chris WF3C

Message: 10
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:45:03 -0700
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules
Message-ID: <54EF4D8F.2050402@w0mu.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

What is the difference?  Who cares?

The rule should say a maximum output of 100 watts to the antenna system
or whatever.    How you get there is irrelevant.

So in this case I can't use my KPA100 with my KX3?  That is just stupid.

The sponsor is not going to be knocking on doors to see how you are
getting your 100 watts out are they?

Where is the NA QP RTTY Steward?  Why no comments or explanations?


Mike W0MU


-- 
Chris Plumblee
407.494.5155
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [RTTY] NAQP Question, Chris Plumblee <=