RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RM-11708

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RM-11708
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 16:10:12 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
You can't reason with Politicians and sadly the ARRL is just another political body. Their goals and profit may or may not line up with ours. They think they have all the clout and flex their muscles all the time.


Mike W0MU

On 2/20/2015 11:23 PM, Ron Kolarik wrote:
If you don't care about this delete it now.

The most recent ARRL Letter has as it's first article a warning about the Mitre license for experimental wideband digital tests. You can read it on the ARRL website or on QRZ, I won't repeat it here but this is what I sent in reply on QRZ


How does the ARRL justify it's wideband digital proposal, FCC RM-11708, in light of it's stand on the Mitre License? I guess when K1ZZ said all we need to do was "spin the knob" doesn't apply in this case. We currently have modes in use on the ham bands where the user can't be easily identified or even decoded for content and now ARRL is worried
about the same thing from Mitre??? I'm confused.

Ron
K0IDT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>