RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] K1N vs ARRL

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] K1N vs ARRL
From: "Charles Morrison" <cmorrison@lusfiber.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:38:45 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
No idea if they read the reflector, but I tagged both K1N and the ARRL in a
Facebook post calling out the ARRL for not practicing what they preach.
Regardless of how the rules are set for their bulletin station and
regardless of if its published, courtesy should rule first and someone needs
to check the frequency before they fire up the bulletin station.

K1N was there first.

Charlie
N5WE


> Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:00:23 -0600
> From: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
> To: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
> Subject: [RTTY] K1N vs ARRL
> Message-ID: <54D42E47.30807@neb.rr.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> 
> It may have been a poor choice of calling frequency, 14095 split down,
> and when the ARRL bulletin came up right on time it was fun to watch.
> Lots of yelling and guys submitting a DQRM report. Remember K1ZZ said
> the answer to this was spin the knob, I didn't know W1AW was rockbound
> :)
> 
> Ron
> K0IDT
********************




_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>