they’d be even more interesting if they werent a year old......
> On 1/26/2015 5:28:02 PM, Jim N7US (jim@n7us.net) wrote:
> > The complete minutes are interesting. They'd be more interesting if we had
> > a news reporter/analyst providing interpretation, especially regarding the
> > ethics discussions.
>
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/About%20ARRL/Board%20Meetings/January%202014%20minutes%20FINAL.pdf
>
>
> 73, Jim N7US
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> great, if it is not a condescending move,,, "OK you told us, set down and
> shut up" type of thing...there is a lack of trust felt on my part here,,,
> then again I went through incentive licensing where the ARRL took away what
> we had and we were rewarded by having to regain what we already had.
> it is ironic that we have to take measures to fight our own organization for
> our right vs, what the ARRL is proposing.
> The ARRL should be advancing our rtty bands, etc,, not taking away to
> accommodate special groups.
> john w8wej
> On 1/26/2015 9:58 PM, WW3S wrote:
> > Thanks Mark for posting.....it appears maybe they’ve learned a lesson,
> > taking it to the membership for input before a final recommendation....
> >
> >> On 1/26/2015 3:55:01 PM, Mark n2qt (n2qt.va@gmail.com) wrote:
> >>> The minutes from the recent Board of Directors meeting was just
> >>> released. Key points
> >> of interest are below, the pending request for comments on
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|