RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs JT

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY vs JT
From: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Reply-to: dave@nk7z.net
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 08:38:26 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I was about to say the same thing Scott!
-- 
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info
for MM-SSTV see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MM-SSTV/info


On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 08:53 -0600, Scott Schultz wrote:
> W4HM wrote:
> "I participated in the ARRL RTTY Roundup this past weekend and never
> operated below 14081, 21081 and 28081 kHz to in order to protect the weak
> JT65A and JT9 signals and it did not impact my score in a negative way."
> 
> Of all the comments, this one is far and away the most ridiculous one I
> have seen! Of course it impacted your score in a negative way. How can you
> possibly know that it did not impact your score if you don't know what
> contacts you may have missed?
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>