hi Walter - I'm a little confused. Some of your examples still show CQ at
the end. Are these examples showing what NOT to do?
Thank you for your work on the RTTY skimmer, I just wish we didn't have to
choose between what works for machines and what works for humans....
73 jeff wk6i
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Walter Dallmeier <
walter.dallmeier@dl4rck.de> wrote:
> Hello RTTY-Contester,
>
> just a reminder ....
> The RTTY Skimmer is not detecting a CQ at the end of a CQ-call anymore,
> cause of to many wrong detections (changed since 4 month).
>
> The best way to be CQ-detected and posted on the skimmer cluster system is
> to place a "QRZ " at the end of the CQ-call. E.g. "CQ TEST XX1XXX XX1XXX
> QRZ " (note the space " " at the end of the call). This QRZ is like a CQ,
> if the CQ at the beginning is missed.
>
> - CQ detection in front of the call
> "CQ DL4RCK " or "CQ DE DL4RCK "
> "CQDX DL4RCK " or "TEST DL4RCK "
> "CQDX DE DL4RCK " or "TEST DE DL4RCK "
>
> - CQ detection after the call
> "... DL4RCK QRZ " or "... DL4RCK QRZ? "
> "... TU DL4RCK CQ " or "... TU DL4RCK QRZ "
> "... TU DL4RCK QRZ? " or "... QSL DL4RCK CQ "
> "... QSL DL4RCK QRZ " or "... QSL DL4RCK QRZ? "
> "... DE DL4RCK CQ " or "... TU DL4RCK QRZ "
> "... DE DL4RCK QRZ? " or "... CFM DL4RCK CQ "
> "... DL4RCK UP "
>
> Connection to the Digital-Cluster System:
> dl4rck.ham-radio-op.net:8000
>
>
> 73 de Walter, DL4RCK
> Walter Dallmeier
> www.dl4rck.de
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
--
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|