I am basically following the same split plan I use while in Guantanamo Bay
and work the pile ups. I start out on simplex until I have started to
generate a pileup. If there is not a pile up, I don't go split. If one
starts, then I go split. I don't see a purpose of taking two or more
frequencies when there isn't a pile up.
Yesterday, I was on 12 meters working as W1AW/4 and in a two hour period, I
had 36 QSOs. I could not justify in my mind to go split.
However, if there were a lot of operator calling, I would have gone split.
Just my thoughts.
73
Stu
K4MIL/KG4SS
-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
rtty-request@contesting.com
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 12:00 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: RTTY Digest, Vol 136, Issue 13
Send RTTY mailing list submissions to
rtty@contesting.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
rtty-request@contesting.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
rtty-owner@contesting.com
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:59:07 +0100
From: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] W1AW/x RTTY operations
Message-ID: <001e01cf54ee$f413c640$dc3b52c0$@guernsey.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi all,
The hunt for the W1AW/x stations continues! I have managed a good few so
far, but I have to wonder about the operating techniques of some of the
operators.
Just for the heck of it, I am aiming to work WAS using only W1AW/x calls.
Most are working split, which is best, but there are a few, and have been
others, that seem to insist on working simplex. This results in a complete
mess, and makes it very difficult to get that all important confirmation of
the QSO.
Earlier today, W1AW/4 was on both 21088 and 28088, saying UP 2 after each
QSO. That worked well, and I logged both bands.
W1AW/1 was on 21082, but trying to work simplex, and the resulting pile made
it impossible for him to work many callers.
So far, there have been a few ops who clearly don't do RTTY on a regular
basis! This is based on the macros in use, simplex operation, and poor
control.
Some of the macros appear to have numerous spaces between calls and info,
and take up almost two lines. The completion of the QSO would be far better
served by a quick TU (call) W1AW/x up 2, rather than this:
GU0SUP DE W1AW/x TU
CQ W1AW/x W1AW/x CQ UP 2 UP 2 PSE KN
I am sure this is preaching to the converted, but some of you may know the
ops, so please pass on the message!
W1AW/x is wanted by many, so working split is obviously the way to go. There
is no difference in working split and getting no response to working simplex
and getting no response - EXCEPT that if you do start to get a pile-up,
being in split mode gives you the upper hand!
And why not use contest-type software with callsign recognition too! Whoever
was the op at W1AW/4 yesterday on 17m seemed to think I was GU0SKP, and even
after trying to correct it, he still sent TU GU0SKP.
Just my thoughts!
73 de Phil GU0SUP
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
******************************
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|