On 29/03/2014 23:41, rtty-request@contesting.com wrote:
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:40:58 -0400
From: " Dave AA6YQ"<aa6yq@ambersoft.com>
To: "'Terry'"<ab5k@hotmail.com>
Cc:rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points
Message-ID:<0e4301cf4b9f$f4c0c0f0$de4242d0$@ambersoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Re " The busy frequency detectors deployed by unattended digital stations are not
effective."
What leads you to this conclusion?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
At least from this side quite all the day by day RTTY operations on
several bands.
Out of books and out of setups make for those detectors. That's worst on
40m and 30m.
The real world doesn't seems to take any advantage of the so called
"Busy frequency detector".
May be those great things are more aimed to detect SETI signals than
plain simple RTTY or CW signals.
73 de iw1ayd Salvo
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|