> Thoughts?
If the Commission agrees to ARRL's stupidity, any bandplan should
restrict wideband digital to existing "automatic control" sub bands
and only on amateur bands where there is a *separate* "RTTY, data"
allocation of more than 125 KHz.
As shown regularly on 80, 30, and 17 meters, with less than 125 KHz
there is simply not enough spectrum to support large numbers of wide
bandwidth digital operations without significant levels of asymmetric
interference to narrow band operations (which represent 99+% of all
non-voice/image operations).
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 3/16/2014 11:45 AM, Terry wrote:
We now have 2 weeks left to respond to the ARRL request for inputs to the
new band plan. There are several options:
1. A few submit band plans that are useful but are not 100 percent
aligned. A lot of folks want to get involved but just don't have time or
possibly technical /writing experience to get involved.
2. We organize, form a committee of recognized RTTY operators and
develop a plan. That plan is published in one week just in time for folks
who are busy to simply send a email to the band plan committee saying "I
agree with the band plan inputs provided by the " RTTY Spectral Defense Band
Plan Committee". They can also add in personal comments as well but
having 'a plan" shows we are serious and aligned. It also saves the band
plan committee sorting thru a bunch of non-aligned plans.
Thoughts?
Terry AB5K
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|