On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:49 PM, <Ktfrog007@aol.com> wrote:
> I concur with your findings. Digital folks really like eQSL, as do I. A
> lot of folks seem to vehemently dislike it, but I like to see QSLs and save
> my favorites into a folder and run it as a slide show when I'm not using
As long as you can fish for QSLs with it I'm not interested.
Otherwise it's fine.
I have, waiting for me to do something about them, 1331 "eQSLs"
waiting in my inbox. One of them is from a 4Z. It's bold, so that
means the authenticity is guaranteed. I really should confirm it
because I've never worked a 4Z or any other 4X station, so that would
be a real treat.
Fix that and I'll sign up.
BTW, on LOTW I'm about 50%. All QSOs are post 1991 and the bulk of
them are post 2004 (with a scattered Qs between those two years - many
confirmed). *My* fervent wish is that more folks On The Ultra-highs
would use LOTW! I have VUCC on 50 MHz but I'd be much closer to 200
grids if more ops were on.
--
Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|