To: | RTTY Reflector <RTTY@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [RTTY] (no subject) |
From: | Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 27 Dec 2013 16:52:26 -0500 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
They cannot explain the decision to not open the discussion to the membership. I imagine they knew they would be establishing a hornets nest but that begs the question: why proceed when so many will have very polarized views? I can accept Kay's comment that the paper stands on its own but she should at least share in the rationale for the way it was managed. 73 Neal Campbell Abroham Neal LLC _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL RM-11708 Letter and response, Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL RM-11708 Letter and response, Kai |
Previous by Thread: | [RTTY] (no subject), Liam liam |
Next by Thread: | [RTTY] ARRL RM-11708 Letter and response, Gordon Bousman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |