RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [RTTY] RM-11708, the "other side"

from [Kok Chen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RM-11708, the "other side"
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:38:20 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> 
On Dec 11, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

> No, the "get serious" issue with emergency communications is that
> there is *no need* for PACTOR III or PACTOR IV on *HF* for EMMCOMM.

If all this is really just about EMCOMM, there is a simple logical solution -- 
only allow wide bandwidths during drills and real emergencies.

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [RTTY] RM-11708, the "other side", Phil Sussman
Next by Date:  [RTTY] Fyi, Jay WS7I
Previous by Thread:  Re: [RTTY] RM-11708, the "other side", Peter Laws
Next by Thread:  Re: [RTTY] RM-11708, the "other side", Bill Turner
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]