Re: [RTTY] 160 m

[Kai <k.siwiak@ieee.org>]

For the same transmitter PEP, JT65 outperforms RTTY by about 29 dB (a power 
ratio of 800).
That will make a big difference on 160 m.
73
Kai, KE4PT

On 10/8/2013 9:15 PM, Rick wrote:
> Tried a stint of RTTY CQs on 1.830-1.840 a couple months ago with no
> takers...
> Seems to be a good mode for weak signals on this band but it doesn't seem to
> be catching on...
>
> Rick - WU6W
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Turner
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 12:02 AM
> To: RTTY Reflector
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] [Amps] 160M PI network Toroidal Coil
>
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:          (may be snipped)
>
> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:53:51 -0700, Jim wrote:
>
> > There is little to no RTTY activity on 160 meters.
> >
> > 73
> > Jim W7RY
> REPLY:
>
> True, there's not much but I do have 26 states worked so far from the west
> coast. . Ron, K0IDT has worked them all with JT65.
>
> Keep an ear on 1808 this winter. You never know.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty