RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] contest change

To: <k0rc@citlink.net>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] contest change
From: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Reply-to: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 07:27:04 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Negative. 2 breaks of 3 hours each is fine.

73
Jim W7RY


-----Original Message----- From: Robert Chudek - K0RC
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 10:22 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] contest change

This is still wrong. In your example 6+0=6 you are counting hours. The
suggested new rule requires a count of two off times. There is only one
off time in 6+0=6.

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN

------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 7/5/2013 11:50 PM, Al Kozakiewicz wrote:
1+1=2
6+0=6
QED

Al
AB2ZY

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Turner
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2013 12:01 AM
To: RTTY Reflector
Subject: Re: [RTTY] contest change

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:          (may be snipped)

On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 20:42:43 -0400, Al wrote:

One of those longest 2 blocks could well be of zero length.
REPLY:

I thought we got rid of the New Math. One plus zero equals two?

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>