RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] QRV during NAQP?

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] QRV during NAQP?
From: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:56:30 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
well, you'd be wrong Lee....thats not the definition of assistance....if I work you and tell you I'm also qrv on 3577.5, thats me telling you, thru normal ham radio means, that I'm also on another freq....now if I told you that North Dakota was qrv on 3577.5, then that would be assistance, I'm telling you another station (not me) is there....

On 2/23/2013 6:43:55 PM, Lee Roberts (ham@n0sq.us) wrote:
Single ops are suppose to operate unassisted. I believe what you're doing defeats the rule.

Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com> wrote ..
> I could say:
>
> QRV 21088 TU WK6I CQ
>
> or
>
> QSY 21088 TU WK6I CQ
>
> or
>
> PLEASE GO TO 21088 I NEED SD TU WK6I CQ
>
> How else do I move a mult I need to another band? Why would using "QRV"
> make it bad? In all three cases I am going to call CQ on 21088 and hope > he
> follows me there. jeff wk6i
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us> wrote:
>
> > Would that be a violation of the rules sending or receiving QRV during
> > exchanges?
> >

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6123 - Release Date: 02/22/13

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>