RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Multi Computer SO2R with N1MM

To: sroabr@gmail.com, n2qt@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Multi Computer SO2R with N1MM
From: k3mm@verizon.net
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:52:33 -0600 (CST)
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
 
I'll have to go back and look, but I've always used N1MM with 2 computer SO2R 
and I've never had to "lie" about the category.  I'm sure there are lots of 
check boxes you have to hit tho!

Usually the soft interlock works OK, but doesnt let you transmit immediately 
(the lag is in the enabling, not disabling).  I dont recall there being an 
overlap problem, but that was probably 50 revisions ago ;)

Ty K3MM

 
 
On 02/22/13, Stein-Roar Brobakken<sroabr@gmail.com> wrote:
 
thanks!!! :)


2013/2/23 Mark n2qt <n2qt@verizon.net>

> Basically you set up for Multi Op and then after the contest change the
> category before creating the cabrillo
> file. (I'd make a backup first!)
>
> For best information take a look at
> http://n1mm.hamdocs.com/tiki-**index.php?page=Single+**
> Operator+Two+Radio+Operation+%**28SO2R%29#Two-Computer_SO2R<http://n1mm.hamdocs.com/tiki-index.php?page=Single+Operator+Two+Radio+Operation+%28SO2R%29#Two-Computer_SO2R>
>
> Mark n2qt
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Stein-Roar Brobakken
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 8:13 PM
> To: Mark n2qt
> Cc: rtty@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Multi Computer SO2R with N1MM
>
>
> to use N1MM in Multi computer SO2R , must you use SINGLE op or MULTI OP
> mode ????
>
> 73s LA6FJA Rag
>
>
> 2013/2/23 Mark n2qt <n2qt@verizon.net>
>
> In W0YK's email on AA5AU's WPX notes in talking about using N1MM
>> for multicomputer SO2R he stated:
>>
>> "I found that the interlock is very slow and 2-3 characters overlap
>> transmission from both radios. OTOH, no software interlocks can guarantee
>> the absence of two signals, if even for milli-seconds, so the operator is
>> responsible via a hardware interlock to not transmit simultaneously."
>>
>>
>> Since I had used this approach to operate SO#R I decided to measure
>> any possible overlap. I would set one rig to cq and then interrupt it by
>> transmitting on the other rig. I did this where one rig was controlled by
>> a networked computer and then with the more typical single computer
>> N1MM SO2R. I used a storage scope to look at the rf output from the
>> rigs.
>>
>> For the networked computer configuration the the worst case was 566ms
>> of overlap with typical overlaps of over 400 ms. As Ed stated this is
>> long
>> enough for several characters to be sent in violation of one signal at a
>> time.
>> Some other interlock is needed for rule compliance.
>>
>> However when using N1MM in its more typical single computer SO2R mode,
>> it is obvious the programmers worked to eliminate this overlap. There
>> typically
>> was a 20 - 40 ms gap with NO RF emitted, between one rig's transmit signal
>> dropping and the second rig's transmit coming up. After many sequences I
>> did
>> manage to get one series where there was just about 44ms of overlap. This
>> is well less than one half character's worth of time. I personally feel
>> good about
>> this performance.
>>
>> The computer used was a HEX Core AMD running WinXp. I had multiple
>> receive
>> windows, packet, along with two instances of CWSkimmer running. I assume
>> for the rare instance of overlap, it was induced by a poorly timed
>> resource demand
>> from one of these other applications. N1MM was set for last one wins for
>> SO2R
>> priority and 'stop other rig's transmit when this rig transmits' networked
>> priority.
>>
>> Mark n2qt
>>
>>
>> ______________________________****_________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/****mailman/listinfo/rtty<http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/rtty>
>> <http://**lists.contesting.com/mailman/**listinfo/rtty<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty>
>> >
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/rtty<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>