RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] WPX suggestion

To: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] WPX suggestion
From: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:38:08 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
OK, Master Chen --

I remember reading something that you authored a while ago about
(-) dashes and USOS and the best way to structure your set-up.

As I recall, perhaps mistakenly, (-) dashes were in order.

How say you?

73 de Phil - N8PS

----

Quoting Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>:

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:06:12 +0000 (UTC), you wrote:


599-123-123-123


Is faster to send than 599 123 123 123

REPLY:
Please, please, please, NO dashes. While it does speed up sending, it
interferes with the USOS (Un Shift On Space) function which most folks
agree is a much better thing to have. USOS greatly reduces requests for
repeats, especially when there is QRM and QRN.

Back in the old days everyone used dashes because that was the conventional
wisdom at the time. Over the years people gradually realized that USOS was
more important and now days very few folks use dashes.

Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>