RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013

To: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013
From: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Reply-to: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:47:16 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL REPLY: 
It baffles me why the FCC bothers with call districts at all. 

At one time before the advent of computers and instant data transfer I suppose
it made sense but those days are long gone. 


MY REPLY: 
What would you like to see instead?

Something less chaotic than what you have down there now, I hope.

73,

Ken Alexander
VE3HLS



________________________________
 From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com> 
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 4:19:31 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint 2013
 
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: 
On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 23:02:36 -0500, you wrote:

>It baffles me why the FCC would let a ham move to a different call 
>district and keep their original call sign 

REPLY: 
It baffles me why the FCC bothers with call districts at all. 

At one time before the advent of computers and instant data transfer I suppose
it made sense but those days are long gone. 

Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>