I am unclear how your comments apply to why the USA has far more
restrictive rules. Bad apples don't care about the rules or laws.
Mike W0MU
W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net:23 or w0mu-1.dnsdynamic.com
Http://www.w0mu.com
On 5/14/2012 11:01 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
>>>> AA6YQ comments below
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of W0MU Mike Fatchett
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:25 AM
> To: rtty@contesting.com
> Subject: [RTTY] mode allocations
>
>
> That is a good question. The good ole USA has more restrictions on
> their operation than any other country. Why? Probably because of all
> the bureaucracy of the Federal Government and if we don't write a bunch
> of rules people are not doing their jobs????
>
> J6 does not have the same power limits on 30m that we do. They can
> operate with 1500 watts, which I think many US amateurs do as well even
> though the limit is 200 watts. I suspect many other countries in NA
> allow more power than 200 watts so why is it just the US getting the
> short end of the deal?
>
> You can operate CW anywhere. Why not RTTY?
>
> Why are we one of the few countries that have SSB subbands? Just
> because we have more people or the Feds know that we can't be trusted to
> gentleman type agreements?
>
> I guess this might be a good question for CQ to ask their new Columnist
> that used to work at the FCC.
>
>>>> Yes, anarchy would be so much better. Recall how impressed everyone here
> was with the gentlemanly behavior in 7O6T RTTY pileups this past weekend;
> what more proof is needed?
>
> 73,
>
> Dave, AA6YQ
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|