Not that I've ever used 60M, but the part that confuses me is that RTTY is
too wide of a signal for the channels, yet somewhere along the lines Pactor
3 with its potential to be the widest of them all, has somehow managed to
narrow its signal to that of PSK and CW? I understand the no automation,
but let a Pactor3 station send a binary, and that signal will be much larger
than any 170hz shifted Rtty, right?
This of course doesn't take into account the potential for the Double Wide
Banders that will no doubt do everything in their capabilities to maintain a
nice "narrow" signal.
SCS.... Behringer....anyone?
Charlie
Ki5xp
> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:56:32 -0700
> From: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] More on 60 meters
> To: rtty@contesting.com
> Message-ID: <4F624970.5010100@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> The really good news is that the ARRL is putting out the info that lets
> it be useful to all US hams.
>
> On 3/15/2012 12:47 PM, Bill Turner wrote:
> > The ARRL has cleared up some of the confusion regarding the new
> > allocations for 60 meters.
> >
> > Details here: http://www.arrl.org/news/60-meters-one-week-later
> >
> > It looks like even narrowband RTTY is still not allowed. Sigh.
> >
> > 73, Bill W6WRT
> >
> > _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|