Well, my logic is to avoid dupes on my log, however it's a good point what
you state about the guy loosing his log.
So you think is better to work dupes instead of ignore them?.. will the
penalties worth?, of course i know there's a limit of dupes before i have a
disqualification and the common sense will tell me when there are too many
dupes.
If I work dupes will have no more than 5 in a whole contest, that macro does
not triggers too often
Tnx!
*********************
XE1EE
Alejandro Valdez O.
DXCC RTTY, SSB & CW
Mixed, 10, 15, 20 & 40
WAS, TPA & WAC
www.dxxe.org
www.qsl.net/xe1ee
Twiter: @xe1ee
***********************
+++++ No mas SPAM ++++++
No me envíes cadenitas, oraciones y demás correos sin mi autorización.
Do not send me prays, chain letters and others without my permission.
** No trees were killed in the sending of this message but a large number of
electrons were terribly inconvenienced**
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 5:01 PM
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle
> "I never work dupes."
>
> What is your logic behind this?
>
> What happens if the fellow who calls you the second time lost his log
> from the first day?
>
> You will get a NIL and penalty when log checking is done. And if he was
> a unique multiplier, you will loose that credit too.
>
> How do we convince you that by not working dupes it will cost you points
> and/or multipliers in the long run?
>
> 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On 2/13/2012 4:33 PM, Alejandro V. XE1EE wrote:
>> Hello Trevor
>>
>> Well, I have a macro who checks the call against the current contest log,
>> if
>> it is a dupe sends Call QSO B4 XE1EE QRZ, if not just sends the serial
>> number and I keep going, I never work dupes.
>>
>> By the way.. you where here 5/9 (on 15 meters) and never heard me :( and
>> I
>> was running 300 watts.
>>
>> Here's the macro I use (on Writelog)
>>
>> %R%C %BQSO B4%RXE1EE QRZ%E%B 599 %N3 %N3%E
>>
>> 73!
>>
>> *********************
>> XE1EE
>> Alejandro Valdez O.
>> DXCC RTTY, SSB& CW
>> Mixed, 10, 15, 20& 40
>> WAS, TPA& WAC
>> www.dxxe.org
>> www.qsl.net/xe1ee
>> Twiter: @xe1ee
>> ***********************
>>
>> +++++ No mas SPAM ++++++
>> No me envíes cadenitas, oraciones y demás correos sin mi autorización.
>> Do not send me prays, chain letters and others without my permission.
>> ** No trees were killed in the sending of this message but a large number
>> of
>> electrons were terribly inconvenienced**
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "trevor dunne"<trevor_dunne@yahoo.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 10:02 AM
>> To: "RTTY-reflektorn"<rtty@contesting.com>
>> Subject: [RTTY] Dupes how to handle
>>
>>> Whats the correct procedure to handle dupe in any contest but mainly WPX
>>> RTTY
>>>
>>> I have a few QSO's that I thought were good but the other station called
>>> me again and when I said QSO B4, I wasn't in there log,
>>>
>>> Do I just delete the first bad QSO and log the 2nd one ???
>>>
>>> How does that affect my serial number count as there will be missing
>>> QSO's
>>> in the log ???
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Trevor
>>> EI2GLB
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|