RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Take Two RTTY Exchange

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Take Two RTTY Exchange
From: Jurgen Geldhof <list@on5mf.be>
Reply-to: on5mf@on5mf.be
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:55:29 +0100
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Can you guys please stop now ;-) ;-)

Next contest I'll be thinking like in the casino when I receive an 
exchange like "CA": there's a chance of 1 in xxx that "CA" means "VA", 
there's a chance of 1 in xxx that "CA" means "CO" etc :-) :-)

Op 17/01/2012 10:49, Kok Chen schreef:
> On Jan 16, 2012, at 11:42 PM, Bill Turner wrote:
>
>> If Ed sends 599 CA and it gets garbled so it prints 599 CO, the other
>> guy sees it's a valid state name and will copy it correctly but the
>> information is wrong.
> This particular example is probably [sic] not a good choice, Bill :-).
>
> 4 out of the 5 Baudot bits of an "A" would have to flip themselves to produce 
> an "O."   A single "CA" printing as "CO" is going to be quite rare.
>
> Threshold biasing from QRM that is on one side of the RTTY signal will not 
> likely produce the CA-to-CO error either, since both A and O have the same 
> Hamming weight.
>
> On the other hand, "CA" turning into "VA" requires only a single bit change.
>
> 73
> Chen, W7AY
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>