RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Take Two RTTY Exchange

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Take Two RTTY Exchange
From: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Reply-to: k0rc@citlink.net
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:12:53 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Well, see, there's a problem with Zero-land... I could be in ND, SD, NE, 
CO, KS, MO, IA or MN. So that doesn't work for me. I have to send a 
subliminal thought with every message I sign.

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN

------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 1/13/2012 6:32 PM, Hank Garretson wrote:
> An additional thought.
>
> My exchange for RTTY Roundup was 599 CA.
>
> With 1250 contacts, I got request for state repeat only four times. I
> haven't run the math, but I'm pretty sure that I came out ahead.
>
> My suggestion. If you have a reasonable signal, you are reasonably well
> know, and you are a six actually in California, 599 CA works better than
> 599 CA CA.
>
> If you are a Canadian, there is no ambiguity at all. Your call sign gives
> your location and repeating BC or ON or whatever twice is a waste of time.
>
> Of course for both Californian and Canadian cases, have a dedicated macro
> key for your location just in case. In my case, I only used it four times.
>
> For CQWW RTTY, 599 3 CA works great for me.
>
> Repeating 599 is always a total waste of time.
>
>
> Contest Exuberantly,
>
> Hank, W6SX
>
> Mammoth Lakes, California
>
> Elevation 8083 feet in John Muir's Range of Light
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>