RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] 10m RTTY power levels

To: "John" <jlockj@earthlink.net>, rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 10m RTTY power levels
From: "KC4HW/Jim" <kc4hw@centurytel.net>
Reply-to: kc4hw@centurytel.net
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:25:27 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
This is a great explanation.  I agree!   Thanks John! 

Jim/KC4HW

On 7 Dec 2011 at 12:47, John wrote:

> My "two bits"... If a person chooses to participate in a contest, I believe 
> they should stay within the rules for that contest. It has nothing to do with 
> the privileges granted you by your license.
> 
> A station running 100 watts in a QRP contest, or 1500 watts in a 150 watt 
> contest, is not competing for operating frequencies or stations calling them 
> on a level playing field. Being stronger than you would otherwise be is also 
> misleading to stations trying to figure out optimal propagation paths and 
> beam headings.
> 
> An analogy would be competing in a stock car race without a restrictor plate. 
> Knowing you have 100 more horsepower than the rest of the field, you might 
> intend to voluntarily withdraw at the end of the race, but that does not mean 
> you did not affect the outcome of the race for people who followed the rules.
> 
> 
> 73,
> 
> John  W0DC
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: W0MU Mike Fatchett 
>   To: rtty@contesting.com 
>   Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 12:25 PM
>   Subject: Re: [RTTY] 10m RTTY power levels
> 
> 
>   I don't understand why the negative comments either.  If I am *not* 
>   going to submit a score then I can operate within the rules for my license.
> 
>   We have had great fun in Field Day running 1A  err  One Alpha...Alpha 
>   amplifier that is....and we have huge pileups.  We don't seem to get any 
>   complaints from all those that called.  Everyone on both sides seemed to 
>   be having fun so what is the issue?
> 
>   Contesting and Ham Radio is supposed to be fun.
> 
>   Mike W0MU
> 
>   W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net
> 
> 
>   On 12/7/2011 11:21 AM, Phil Cooper wrote:
>   > Hi all,
>   >
>   > I wasn't having a go at anyone with my comments, although I now see that 
> it
>   > may have appeared this way.
>   >
>   > I am sure there are some that didn't read the rules, or planned to send 
> in a
>   > checklog anyway, and kudos to them for operating this way.
>   >
>   > I did wonder if I had mis-read the rules in some way, as that wouldn't be
>   > unknown either. I did re-check just to see if multi-op stations were 
> allowed
>   > high power, as that can be the case in some contests.
>   >
>   > I also wanted to make sure that anyone who submitted a 3830 score under 
> HP,
>   > knew that this was probably in their Cabrillo file too, and to check!
>   >
>   > Whichever way you look at it, this was a great contest, and it is good to
>   > see 10m alive now.
>   > There were some nice DX stations active, and my contact with VP2MWG has
>   > already been confirmed on LoTW.
>   >
>   > 73 all
>   >
>   > Phil GU0SUP
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > ---
>   > avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
>   > Virus Database (VPS): 111207-0, 07/12/2011
>   > Tested on: 07/12/2011 18:21:14
>   > avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011 AVAST Software.
>   > http://www.avast.com
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > _______________________________________________
>   > RTTY mailing list
>   > RTTY@contesting.com
>   > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>   _______________________________________________
>   RTTY mailing list
>   RTTY@contesting.com
>   http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>