On Feb 16, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Al Kozakiewicz wrote:
> And given that the last model 15 or KSR33 departed the scene decades ago, why
> aren't we using ASCII, anyway?
Not all software modems can do ASCII Radioteletype.
Most software can, but unfortunately not all of the common ones in use.
Another unfortunate misconception when you mention ASCII is that many people
immediately think "110 baud." But you can use 45.45 baud just as well -- no
need for the "Hz counters" to go buy new crystal filters.
When I was helping write the Digital Modes chapter of the 2010 ARRL Handbook, I
noticed that the editor had left out ASCII Radioteletype (I only contributed to
the RTTY, PSK31 and MFSK16 parts, the larger part of the chapter was written by
K7SS). I asked N0AX if we should include it back in the 2011 Handbook (when I
added the DominoEX section) I was told that there is no need since no one uses
it.
There are so many advantages of ASCII over Baudot (especially given another
round of "what is 599 PQW?" postings) that it is a shame... But I won't harp
on it.
73
Chen, W7AY
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|