>> Yes, but a extra space (or CR) adds almost 22 ms to an exchange
Actually each character adds 165 ms (7.5 x 22) ... three spaces
add a whopping 495 ms.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2/13/2011 9:02 PM, Al Kozakiewicz wrote:
> Yes, but a extra space (or CR) adds almost 22 ms to an exchange and, well,
> those add up, don't they? Wasn't there a thread discussing that here just
> recently?
>
> ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^)
>
> Al
> AB2ZY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Bill, W6WRT
> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 8:54 PM
> To: rtty@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return
>
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:20:58 -0500 (EST), W70m@aol.com wrote:
>
>> For purposes of a thread, I find the use of carriage returns at the
>> termination of a macro to save a lot of repeats; not to mention busted
>> calls
>
> REPLY:
>
> A carriage return is better than nothing, but even better is just a single
> space. The carriage return with some software will cause the text to jump up
> a line just as you are trying to click on it. A space serves the same purpose
> of separating text from noise but avoids the jump.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|