This is a good point. I can't see any immediate drawbacks, so I'll
change my running macros for the WPX RTTY. Not that I run much, but I try.
If
I can get 10% of my QSOs running, I consider it a really good weekend.
73,
Kermit, AB1J
In a message dated 1/11/2011 12:28:49 A.M. GMT Standard Time,
rayday@cox.net writes:
How about the CQ-ing station on the QSL/QRZ transmission of the
exchange send, rather than "N6HE QSL W1XXX CQ" send instead "TU N6HE
W1XXX CQ" or "QSL N6HE W1XXX CQ?"
Seems like a minor point, but when the rhythm of the QSO is
established, I can tell when the station I worked is sending to me
and all I want to know is (and quickly) "did I get my info QSL'd?" so
sending TU or QSL first would allow me to quickly slide off looking
for my next victim and yet the CQ-ing station wouldn't be slowed
down. Lots of those 3-seconds periods really add up!!
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|