Sure ref: ACP 126C. 850 Hz shift works very well on 2 Mhz military channels
Jafy
On 6/9/2010 4:37 PM, Robert Chudek - K0RC wrote:
> No one will be using a wider shift. It wastes bandwidth and is prone to more
> errors.
>
> Do you have a url regarding a "NATO standard 850 Hz Shift"? I've never heard
> of it.
>
> 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeffrey M. Swiger"<N8NOE@ARRL.Net>
> To:<rtty@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 5:11 PM
> Subject: [RTTY] BARTG 75 RTTY Sprint?
>
>
>
>> Hi all,
>> Been some Talk and I have got Software setup.
>> QUESTION: at the 75 Baud is anyone Changing the Width of the Shift?
>> I have heard 2 Sides of this, 1 to stay at 170/200Hz Shift,
>> and another in Reading the NATO standard of 850Hz Shift?
>>
>> Jeff-N8NOE
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by ClamAV]
>
>
>
>
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by ClamAV]
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|