RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] MM in RU

To: <RTTY@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] MM in RU
From: "Tom Martin" <tmartin@chartermi.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:49:00 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I would vote against MM in RU. Every year the bands, except 10 and 15 get, are 
becoming packed with RU participants.  That's good. However, this year there 
were more stations operating above 14.120 than ever. There were signals up to 
14.140. Also, I copied RTTY below 14. 070.  In my opinion, adding  MM ops to 
the mix, would create a wall of QRM for those not in the contest.  Forty meters 
is bad enough for the CW ops.

Many MM stations allow single ops to man their stations for the weekend.  That 
is fine with me.


I wouldn't mind a separate class for SO2R.  I use two radios and it is an 
advantage over the SO1R.  It takes a lot of practice and effort to do SO2R 
correctly.  It is a disadvantage at times, until you get the hang of it.  

Nice job W6WRT!  Bill, how can you work 241 stations on 15 meters?  
Location...Location...Location???  My second radio was extremely quiet on 15.  
Of course, the vertical wasn't the best antenna for the job.  I did put the 
SteppIR on 15 to work CX for a mult.  I even called CQ on 15 with that antenna 
but didn't get any run going.

I still can't believe W8AKS didn't hear me CQing on 80 and 40.  Marty, did you 
S and P?

Worked P49X last night on 160.  There didn't seem to be many RTTY guys on.  

73,

Tom W8JWN





-- 
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 471 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>