RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 84, Issue 16

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 84, Issue 16
From: "GILBERTO Jr." <gilmail3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:06:26 -0200
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
*PEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME,*
*THANKS*
*gilmail3@gmail.com*

2009/12/15 <rtty-request@contesting.com>

> Send RTTY mailing list submissions to
>        rtty@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        rtty-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        rtty-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RTTY digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. QSL Survey (Tom Martin)
>   2. Re: QSL survey (Schmidt-Eutingen)
>   3. Re: QSL survey (SP4K)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:29:57 -0600
> From: "Tom Martin" <tmartin@chartermi.net>
> Subject: [RTTY] QSL Survey
> To: <rtty@contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <2AF477B3AB22428C9B87F375C979CBDC@hcdiuser224148>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> 1.  LOTW is my first choice.  I have a 38% return.  RTTY guys are the most
> responsive.  160 meter DX confirmations very poor at 16%.
>
> 2.  Don't like eQsl.  Will confirm if begged.
>
> 3.  I use the various QSL bureaus for outgoing and incoming.  I have four
> calls to cover.  Two are DX calls.
>
> 4.  I will QSL direct if I need one.  Thankfully, only 7 more countries
> needed for them all.
>
> 73,
>
> Tom W8JWN
>
> --
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
> We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
> SPAMfighter has removed 402 of my spam emails to date.
> Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
>
> The Professional version does not have this message
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:19:03 +0100
> From: "Schmidt-Eutingen" <joheschmidt@gmx.de>
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] QSL survey
> To: <RTTY@contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <F4B03AB556A04E4CABCB754A903E610B@heinzopc5jydoy>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="Windows-1252"
>
> > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:41:46 -0000
> > From: "Don W5FKX" <w5fkx@cox.net>
> > Subject: [RTTY] QSL survey
>
> 1. Do you use the Logbook of the World (LOTW)?
>
> Yes, and I like it .
>
> 2. Do you use the eQSL service?
>
> No not yet .
>
> 3. Do you use the QSL Bureau system?
>
> Yes, I send a QSL-card for every first contact
> via the DARC-QSL-bureau.
>
>  4. Do you send out direct QSLs?
>
> No.
>
> 5. What is the approximate percentages of your QSLs received via:
>
>  LOTW         about 25%, most of them  digital-QSO's
>  eQSL         no idea yet
>  Bureau      30%
>  Direct        -------
>
> I should appreciate negotiations between ARRL and i.e the DARC to
> permit the use of LOTW for other  diplomas too.
>
> Heinz DK7UM
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:43:51 +0100
> From: SP4K <sp4k@vp.pl>
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] QSL survey
> To: RTTY@contesting.com
> Message-ID:
>        <
> Q10563516-8107e2a709ed58ac729a2e3b3f0130d9@pmq2.m5r2.onet.test.onet.pl>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
>
>
>  1. Do you use the Logbook of the World (LOTW)?
>
> Yes, on daily basis. Usually uploading new QSOs the same or next day.
>
> 2. Do you use the eQSL service?
>
> Yes, uploading logs once per year.
>
> 3. Do you use the QSL Bureau system?
>
> Yes, usually sending cards every 2 months or so, depending on the volume of
> received ones.
>
> 4. Do you send out direct QSLs?
>
> Yes, in case no LoTW prompt confirmation available for a new one or new
> band/mode.
>
> 5. What is the approximate percentages of your QSLs received via:
>
> LOTW 37%( of uploaded logs )
> eQSL 23% ( of uploaded logs )
> Bureau no idea, too many to count for this survey :)
> Direct approx 3%
>
> Total logs volume with SP4K callsign: ca. 12.000 QSOs
>
> Comment:
>
> LoTW is really nice tool for DXCC confirmations. RTTY folks are the best
> ones there, topbanders are - unfortunately - well behind the mainstream.
>
> Missing more renown awards in LoTW - the CQ ones are the top of the wish
> list.
>
> 73 de Chris SP4K
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
> End of RTTY Digest, Vol 84, Issue 16
> ************************************
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 84, Issue 16, GILBERTO Jr. <=