RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] QSL survey

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] QSL survey
From: Tom Carrubba KA2D <ka2d@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:07:30 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
1. I use LOTW and like it. My preferred method of QSL.
2. I upload my logs to eQSL but do not use it for awards.
3. I use the QSL bureau system but prefer LOTW.
4. I send direct QSLs when necessary.


30-40%
Don't track
80-90%
90%

73,
Tom KA2D

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Don W5FKX" <w5fkx@cox.net>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:41 PM
Subject: [RTTY] QSL survey


> Although this may be a bit off-topic, I hope that it is not objectionable. 
> I am conducting an informal survey of QSLing methods and would very much 
> appreciate your input. Please respond directly to me.
>
> 1. Do you use the Logbook of the World (LOTW)?
> If not, what has kept you from using it?
>
> 2. Do you use the eQSL service?
> If not, what has kept you from using it?
>
> 3. Do you use the QSL Bureau system?
> If not, what has kept you from using it?
>
> 4. Do you send out direct QSLs?
> If not, what has kept you from doing so?
>
> 5. What is the approximate percentages of your QSLs received via:
> LOTW
> eQSL
> Bureau
> Direct
>
> Thanks very much for your participation. Any additional comments are 
> welcome.
>
> 73,
> Don W5FKX
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>