Same here. Been putting off 160 way too long. This would be the perfect
reason.
Erik - K5WW
----- Original Message -----
From: "W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>
To: <w0yk@msn.com>; "'RTTY Reflector'" <rtty@contesting.com>;
<topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 160m in RTTY Contests
> I, like some others, would like to see a 160M RTTY contest rather than
> adding the band to the existing contests. It would certainly be motivation
> for me to get something on the "Top Band".
>
> Clint - W5CPT
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ed Muns
> To: 'RTTY Reflector' ; topband@contesting.com
> Sent: 26 October, 2009 2:24 PM
> Subject: [RTTY] 160m in RTTY Contests
>
>
> Most (all?) RTTY contests prohibit operation on 160 meters. Yet, a
> number
> of RTTY contesters have asked that it be added. I'd like to hear your
> thoughts on this topic, pro and con. In particular, I'm thinking about
> the
> CQ WPX RTTY and CQ WW RTTY contests.
>
> Ed - W0YK
> CQ RTTY Contest Director
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Ed Muns
> Muns Vineyard - www.munsvineyard.com
> FaceBook - www.facebook.com/munsvineyard
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|