RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] CQWW RTTY interesting rules

To: Tom Homewood <w1to@roadrunner.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] CQWW RTTY interesting rules
From: Andrei Stchislenok <asnp3d@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:45:08 -0300
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Agree.

2009/9/20 Tom Homewood <w1to@roadrunner.com>

> I believe the CQWW RTTY contest is one of the few that recognizes that
> Europe has a big advantage in CQWW CW or SSB. Letting USA treat states as a
> multiplier tends to level the playing field a little.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> 73, Tom, W1TO
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
> To: "RTTY Reflector" <rtty@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 1:16 PM
> Subject: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] CQWW RTTY interesting rules
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steve London" <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
> > To: "reflector cq-contest" <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
> > Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 12:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW RTTY interesting rules
> >
> >
> >> Flame on....
> >>
> >> RTTY activity has dramatically increased in the past decade. Hasn't RTTY
> >> activity reached the point that the CQWW RTTY could have the same rules
> >> as
> >> the
> >> CQWW CW and SSB contests ?  Almost every weekend there is an
> >> everyone-works-everyone RTTY contest. Isn't it time for a world-class,
> >> everyone-works-only-DX RTTY contest ?  Until the CQWW RTTY adopts the
> >> same
> >> rules
> >> as its big brothers, it will be, in my mind, a poor cousin to the CQWW
> CW
> >> and
> >> CQWW SSB contests.
> >>
> >> 73,
> >> Steve, N2IC
> >>
> >> K1TTT wrote:
> >>> If you still haven't looked into operating CQWW RTTY this coming
> weekend
> >>> please give it a serious thought.  This is a MUCH different event than
> >>> CW
> >>> and SSB  In this one there are NO ZERO POINT QSO's.  And States and
> >>> Provinces count as multipliers in addition to the normal countries and
> >>> zones.  And yes, that does mean there are TRIPLE multipliers!!  So yes,
> >>> there will be activity on 10m and 15m where we all want to work states
> >>> in
> >>> addition to the zones. Just think, get on 10m and you could be a TRIPLE
> >>> multiplier for lots of stations!  So please think about it, even if for
> >>> only
> >>> a few hours, and don't forget 10m!
> >>>
> >>> Check out last year's results and this year's rules at:
> >>> http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/RTTYDXContest.html
> >>>
> >>> And don't forget to post your scores in real time to
> >>> http://www.getscores.org/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> David Robbins K1TTT
> >>> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
> >>> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> >>> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RTTY mailing list
> > RTTY@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>



-- 
73's Andrei
EW1AR-NP3D
----------------------------------------------------
DXCC RTTY via LoTW only
Who has what? - World Wide Rating
Please visit: www.k4fo.com/cqrtty/
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>